PAIR.TRADING
↔

Press space to swap the legs.

1.925 MET
RLC = 0.853 USDT
MET = 0.443 USDT

RLC / MET ratio and spread

1 RLC = 1.925 MET. Below is the price ratio chart and the regression spread z-score. Hedge ratio β is 0.572 and the correlation between the legs is 0.21.

Set an alert on this pair The spread z-score is 0.45 right now. Get a message when it reaches your level — instead of watching the chart.
Free alerts

If you hold RLC · If you hold MET

Hedge ratio β 0.572
Spread z-score 0.45
Correlation 0.21
Half-life 28.9 1d
The spread is within ±2σ — the pair is near its own norm.

Sign in to keep favourite pairs.

Alerts

Sign in to set your own alerts.

Key numbers

Current ratio1.92528
Change 1d-16.23%
Change 7d71.24%
Change 30d23.50%
Period high3.71538
Period low0.931026
Hedge ratio β0.572
Spread z-score0.45
Correlation0.21
Half-life29 d

over 330 daily candles

What the numbers say

The legs barely move together: correlation of daily log returns is only 0.21. A spread built on such a weak link reverts by coincidence rather than by mechanism.

The spread is at 0.45 standard deviations from its rolling mean, which is effectively at its own norm.

Historically the spread covers half the way back to its mean in about 29 days, so a divergence here tends to resolve within weeks rather than months.

The current ratio sits mid-range — 36% of the way from the low to the high of the last 330 daily candles.

Frequently asked

How many MET is 1 RLC?

1 RLC is worth 1.92528 MET at the latest exchange quotes. The figure is the ratio of the two USDT prices and updates every minute.

What is the RLC/MET range?

Over the last 330 daily candles the ratio traded between 0.931026 (28.09.2026) and 3.71538 (29.05.2026).

Are RLC and MET correlated?

The correlation of daily log returns between RLC and MET is 0.21, which counts as a weak link. Log returns are used rather than prices: two rising assets correlate almost by default, joint day-to-day movement is what matters.

What is the RLC/MET spread z-score now?

The z-score is 0.45 — the spread is within its usual range. It measures how far the regression residual log(A) − β·log(B) sits from its rolling mean, in standard deviations.

Is RLC/MET suitable for a pair trade?

Weakly. Correlation is only 0.21, so the legs do not reliably move together and the spread carries mostly idiosyncratic noise.

Related pairs

Other pairs sharing a leg with this one.

All figures are computed from exchange data and describe past behaviour. Nothing here is investment advice.

Converter

RLC
MET