RLC / DOT ratio and spread
1 RLC = 0.9337861 DOT. Below is the price ratio chart and the regression spread z-score. Hedge ratio β is 0.855 and the correlation between the legs is 0.49.
If you hold RLC · If you hold DOT
RLC has been more expensive against DOT than now only 0 % of the time over 1.0 years. If you hold RLC, this is worth a look at rotating into DOT.
Sign in to keep favourite pairs.
Alerts
Sign in to set your own alerts.
Key numbers
over 376 daily candles
How each of these is computed: regression spread, hedge ratio, spread z-score, half-life, correlation.
What the numbers say
The legs move together only moderately — correlation of daily log returns is 0.49, with a hedge ratio of 0.85. Signals from this pair carry more noise than on a tightly linked one.
The spread currently sits at 6.36 standard deviations above its rolling mean — RLC is expensive relative to DOT by the standards of this window.
Reversion is slow: the spread needs roughly 35 days to cover half the way back to its mean. A position would have to be held for a long time.
The current ratio sits in the upper part of its range — 100% of the way from the low to the high of the last 376 daily candles.
Frequently asked
How many DOT is 1 RLC?
1 RLC is worth 0.933786 DOT at the latest exchange quotes. The figure is the ratio of the two USDT prices and updates every minute.
What is the RLC/DOT range?
Over the last 376 daily candles the ratio traded between 0.235821 (28.02.2026) and 0.933786 (09.10.2026).
Are RLC and DOT correlated?
The correlation of daily log returns between RLC and DOT is 0.49, which counts as a moderate link. Log returns are used rather than prices: two rising assets correlate almost by default, joint day-to-day movement is what matters.
What is the RLC/DOT spread z-score now?
The z-score is 6.36 — the spread is stretched beyond two standard deviations. It measures how far the regression residual log(A) − β·log(B) sits from its rolling mean, in standard deviations.
Is RLC/DOT suitable for a pair trade?
The mechanics hold up: correlation is 0.49 and the spread historically covers half the way back to its mean in about 35 days. That is a description of past behaviour, not a forecast or a recommendation.
Related pairs
Other pairs sharing a leg with this one.
All figures are computed from exchange data and describe past behaviour. Nothing here is investment advice.