MUBARAK / SAND ratio and spread
1 MUBARAK = 0.9419037 SAND. Below is the price ratio chart and the regression spread z-score. Hedge ratio β is 0.451 and the correlation between the legs is 0.47.
If you hold MUBARAK · If you hold SAND
MUBARAK has been more expensive against SAND than now only 3 % of the time over 1.5 years. If you hold MUBARAK, this is worth a look at rotating into SAND.
Sign in to keep favourite pairs.
Alerts
Sign in to set your own alerts.
Key numbers
over 557 daily candles
How each of these is computed: regression spread, hedge ratio, spread z-score, half-life, correlation.
What the numbers say
The legs move together only moderately — correlation of daily log returns is 0.47, with a hedge ratio of 0.45. Signals from this pair carry more noise than on a tightly linked one.
The spread currently sits at 2.25 standard deviations above its rolling mean — MUBARAK is expensive relative to SAND by the standards of this window.
Reversion is slow: the spread needs roughly 35 days to cover half the way back to its mean. A position would have to be held for a long time.
The current ratio sits mid-range — 50% of the way from the low to the high of the last 557 daily candles.
Frequently asked
How many SAND is 1 MUBARAK?
1 MUBARAK is worth 0.941904 SAND at the latest exchange quotes. The figure is the ratio of the two USDT prices and updates every minute.
What is the MUBARAK/SAND range?
Over the last 557 daily candles the ratio traded between 0.0930678 (15.04.2025) and 1.79003 (23.09.2026).
Are MUBARAK and SAND correlated?
The correlation of daily log returns between MUBARAK and SAND is 0.47, which counts as a moderate link. Log returns are used rather than prices: two rising assets correlate almost by default, joint day-to-day movement is what matters.
What is the MUBARAK/SAND spread z-score now?
The z-score is 2.25 — the spread is stretched beyond two standard deviations. It measures how far the regression residual log(A) − β·log(B) sits from its rolling mean, in standard deviations.
Is MUBARAK/SAND suitable for a pair trade?
The mechanics hold up: correlation is 0.47 and the spread historically covers half the way back to its mean in about 35 days. That is a description of past behaviour, not a forecast or a recommendation.
Related pairs
Other pairs sharing a leg with this one.
All figures are computed from exchange data and describe past behaviour. Nothing here is investment advice.