BEAMX / QNT ratio and spread
1 BEAMX = 1.05E-5 QNT. Below is the price ratio chart and the regression spread z-score. Hedge ratio β is 0.928 and the correlation between the legs is 0.36.
If you hold BEAMX · If you hold QNT
BEAMX is cheaper against QNT than in 1 % of the time over 1.0 years. If you hold QNT, this is worth a look at rotating into BEAMX.
Sign in to keep favourite pairs.
Alerts
Sign in to set your own alerts.
Key numbers
over 371 daily candles
How each of these is computed: regression spread, hedge ratio, spread z-score, half-life, correlation.
What the numbers say
The legs barely move together: correlation of daily log returns is only 0.36. A spread built on such a weak link reverts by coincidence rather than by mechanism.
The spread currently sits at -4.18 standard deviations from its rolling mean — BEAMX is cheap relative to QNT by the standards of this window.
Reversion is slow: the spread needs roughly 123 days to cover half the way back to its mean. A position would have to be held for a long time.
The current ratio sits near the bottom of its range — only 4% of the way from the low to the high of the last 371 daily candles.
Frequently asked
How many QNT is 1 BEAMX?
1 BEAMX is worth 0.00001050339388708 QNT at the latest exchange quotes. The figure is the ratio of the two USDT prices and updates every minute.
What is the BEAMX/QNT range?
Over the last 371 daily candles the ratio traded between 0.000006808815014135 (01.10.2026) and 0.000092766355140187 (07.10.2025).
Are BEAMX and QNT correlated?
The correlation of daily log returns between BEAMX and QNT is 0.36, which counts as a weak link. Log returns are used rather than prices: two rising assets correlate almost by default, joint day-to-day movement is what matters.
What is the BEAMX/QNT spread z-score now?
The z-score is -4.18 — the spread is stretched beyond two standard deviations. It measures how far the regression residual log(A) − β·log(B) sits from its rolling mean, in standard deviations.
Is BEAMX/QNT suitable for a pair trade?
Weakly. Correlation is only 0.36, so the legs do not reliably move together and the spread carries mostly idiosyncratic noise.
Related pairs
Other pairs sharing a leg with this one.
All figures are computed from exchange data and describe past behaviour. Nothing here is investment advice.